You may recall that Ronald Kuch's lawyer insisted that Michigan's sodomy statute doesn't outlaw sex with a dead dog. A judge says Kuch should still stand trial. (Bay City Times)
I wonder what his girlfriend, the dog's owner, thinks of her sweetheart now.
Posted by: Sheila | Monday, February 26, 2007 at 09:28 AM
Im sure shes forgiven him by now
Posted by: stomper | Monday, February 26, 2007 at 09:53 AM
Good Lord. That is horrifying....the dog had been dead for a WEEK! Ugh. That person has some serious issues.
Posted by: V | Monday, February 26, 2007 at 10:15 AM
This is why we need a law against being a sick f*ck. For all those people who think they can subvert the law simply by doing something that no one in their right mind would ever conceive of someone doing, this net would catch them.
As a side note, I wonder where in the prison pecking order a guy who sodomizes dead animals ends up.
Posted by: Drake Timbershaft | Monday, February 26, 2007 at 10:35 AM
Solitary Confinement, that's where.
Posted by: jdotglenn | Monday, February 26, 2007 at 10:37 AM
I'm resisting the temptation to draw comparisons to my ex. Must... resist...
Posted by: Joel | Monday, February 26, 2007 at 11:33 AM
Deer....Dog......damn!
Posted by: pdg | Monday, February 26, 2007 at 12:24 PM
Someone just kill him to remove him from the earth. What a sick and messed up mental case.
Posted by: | Monday, February 26, 2007 at 12:49 PM
Ok this is what gets me. I don't understand this at all. The state wants to put this man in jail for sodomy, and we all know sodomy NEVER takes place in jail right?
Posted by: Cameltoes | Monday, February 26, 2007 at 02:57 PM
I think the problem here is no so much his romp with Rover, but his desire to do it near a day care center. This is the sort of thing best not viewed by the kiddies, and even adults also.
Posted by: Get Real | Monday, February 26, 2007 at 03:08 PM
EEEWWWW!!! Someone boil that man in a vat of bleach. Some things, I just don't wanna know.
Posted by: Emily | Monday, February 26, 2007 at 04:41 PM
this sounds like the plot line to a ren and stimpy cartoon. they should lock this sick f*ck, up with a few rottweilers
Posted by: phantom | Monday, February 26, 2007 at 04:49 PM
Since they caught him in the act and it had been there a week he almost certainly had been a repeat customer. He came to get one last quickie before they removed the corpse. It's amazing what some humans are capable of.
Posted by: Charlotta Fajita | Monday, February 26, 2007 at 05:17 PM
You people all talk like people talked about gays 40 years ago. I could care less if the guy wants to screw a dead dog, I just don't want to see an Annual Dead Dog F*ckers Pride Parade forty years from now.
Posted by: | Monday, February 26, 2007 at 05:58 PM
Bestiality - or necrophiliac bestiality - has nothing to do with homosexuality. For goodness sake.
Posted by: WZ | Monday, February 26, 2007 at 06:16 PM
Bestiality - or necrophiliac bestiality - has nothing to do with homosexuality. For goodness sake.
They are both sexual perversions. For goodness sake.
Posted by: | Monday, February 26, 2007 at 06:49 PM
According to you. However, one involves two consenting adults, making it no one else's business, and one clearly does not.
Comparing them is stupid.
Posted by: WZ | Tuesday, February 27, 2007 at 04:26 AM
that is just gross - dead for a week think of all the bugs!
Posted by: | Tuesday, February 27, 2007 at 05:50 AM
The anon guy equating this with homosexuality is just a troll with latency issues.
This dead-dog Casanova needs serious therapy, not prison. However, I would like assurance that until such therapy has run its course that this person will be watched rather closely.
It must be pure hell inside that guys head. Sad, really. But still sick.
Posted by: Village Idiot | Tuesday, February 27, 2007 at 06:45 AM
Couldn't he just take advantage of Rosy Palm? Ish
Posted by: | Tuesday, February 27, 2007 at 06:52 AM
"Comparing them is stupid."
According to you. Just because something involves "consenting adults" does not mean it can't be a sexual perversion. As for the other one, it clearly involves a dead piece of flesh. What's next, every guy who has done a pound of hamburger or a jar of peanut butter, or a girl who has done a cucumber, should suddenly face prosecution and persecution?
"The anon guy equating this with homosexuality is just a troll with latency issues."
I wish gays would come up with something new. It's getting old to be accused of latency issues just because a person says homosexuality is a perversion.
"This dead-dog Casanova needs serious therapy"
They said the same thing about gays 40 years ago.
You would like assurance that this person be watched closely? What, volunteering?
Posted by: | Tuesday, February 27, 2007 at 08:33 AM
I took a look at this today and just opposite the headlines on the left, is the "Top National News" with a picture of Dick Cheney.
Posted by: | Tuesday, February 27, 2007 at 09:49 AM
I think I sprained my eyes rolling them at Anonymous. Whoever shall I send the medical bill to? :P
Posted by: WZ | Tuesday, February 27, 2007 at 11:03 AM
so ... what if it was a week old side of beef instead? Would they prosecute animal cruelty against the dead cow?
What if it was just a roast with a hole in it?
What about a beloved pet that has been taxidermied then mounted ... then mounted repeatedly. Would that be illegal?
Does the line get drawn when it's an identifiable corpse, or when there was an attachment to the deceased?
Posted by: Dillenger69 | Tuesday, February 27, 2007 at 02:27 PM
"What if it was just a roast with a hole in it?"
Sounds an awful lot like my ex.
Posted by: Cameltoes | Tuesday, February 27, 2007 at 02:58 PM
That is seriously one of the sickest things I've ever heard....His CURRENT girlfriend? Let me find out my husband like having...sexual contact...with animal carcasses *shudder* I mean....how long does it take one to be considered..."sexually deviant"? What does one have to do? Cause that's nasty.
Posted by: Lady Luck | Wednesday, February 28, 2007 at 07:54 AM