The man says the lid on the jar of fruit popped off, flew in the air, struck him in the eye and knocked him out. He suffered "injuries to his head and face," blurred vision and other injuries and wants more than the $150,000 that was offered to settle. (Detroit News)

My neck! My neck and my back!
Posted by: sometimesilie | Thursday, November 18, 2010 at 06:52 AM
Billy Staples?
Posted by: DS | Thursday, November 18, 2010 at 07:08 AM
I had the same problem with my vision after I saw Rosie O'Donnell nude. 'My eyes! My eyes!'
Posted by: TequilaJoe | Thursday, November 18, 2010 at 07:18 AM
I had the same problem with my vision after I saw Rosie O'Donnell nude. 'My eyes! My eyes!'
Posted by: TequilaJoe | Thursday, November 18, 2010 at 07:18 AM
Let's throw rotten apples at him until he *really* gets a concussion.
Posted by: Phranqlin | Thursday, November 18, 2010 at 07:29 AM
You saw Rosie O'Donnell nude???? Twice??? Why the hell would you look????
Posted by: r | Thursday, November 18, 2010 at 07:29 AM
My uncle had a tie clip that made his nose fall off.
Not really, but it sounds just as stupid.
Posted by: KDP | Thursday, November 18, 2010 at 07:41 AM
he originally asked for only half the settlement amount
Posted by: Lambiepie | Thursday, November 18, 2010 at 08:44 AM
he is suing for $75k b/c $150k isnt enough? that lid must have hit him pretty hard
Posted by: buddy | Thursday, November 18, 2010 at 08:45 AM
@buddy: the vic sought $75k. The lawyer says twice that much isn't enough. Everyone who's surprised, raise your hand...
Posted by: Max Headroom | Thursday, November 18, 2010 at 08:58 AM
A screwdriver is not the best means of opening a jar. I guess he knows that now.
Posted by: Sheila | Thursday, November 18, 2010 at 09:04 AM
It's too bad that lid didn't do more damage, and remove him from the gene pool.
Posted by: Rock Marine | Thursday, November 18, 2010 at 09:17 AM
Rock, let's just drain the damn pool.
Posted by: American Veteran | Thursday, November 18, 2010 at 10:07 AM
Seems that he should have sued the screwdriver manufacturer and the store he bought it in too. I mean, c'mon...if it wasn't for the screwdriver the accident wouldn't have happened.
Posted by: Chrysos | Thursday, November 18, 2010 at 10:14 AM
YOU'LL GET NOTHING AND BE HAPPY WITH IT MISTER!!!
$150k is not enough. I want enough to retire on since I was knocked out by my own dumb actions.
First of all go to the library and borrow 'Tools and Their Uses'. That is not how a screwdriver should be used.
How are they not suing Stanley, since the screwdriver didn't explicitly state not to open fruit cocktail?
Posted by: Tom Weidermeijer | Thursday, November 18, 2010 at 10:54 AM
Sorry Chrysos... just saw your post.
Posted by: Tom Weidermeijer | Thursday, November 18, 2010 at 10:54 AM
if he declines the settlement it then goes to trial
the jury will either give him millions or suggest he go to remedial can/jar opening classes at the local community college
Posted by: Lambiepie | Thursday, November 18, 2010 at 11:40 AM
Great line, sometimesilie!
From now on you will be Ezel to me.
Posted by: MidtownCoog | Thursday, November 18, 2010 at 12:39 PM
This is why America is failing. If you can't sue for $75k and get rewarded at least 4 times the amount you originally sued for then the terrorists have already won.
Plus - Sterilize 'em with his own frickin' screwdriver.
Posted by: mE.! | Thursday, November 18, 2010 at 03:48 PM
Made up story. Lid knocked him out?? GD candy ass.
A REAL MAN don't need no stinken screwdriver to open a fricken jar, he'd use his only tooth, the one in the front.
Posted by: The Hermit | Thursday, November 18, 2010 at 08:01 PM
Greedy idiot. "I sees a bullshit way to make easy money, don't have to work for it? Awesome."
Posted by: Albert911emt | Friday, November 19, 2010 at 04:06 AM
IMO, by using a screwdriver to open a screw top cap; he contributed to or caused his own injuries. The cap is designed to be unscrewed; it clearly was defective; his proper course of action was to return it for a replacement or a refund. By opening it in a manner in which it was not designed to be opened, he voided any supposed real or implied warranties.
Lets say you walk out to your car and you notice brake fluid all over the ground underneath it, you start it up and the brake idiot light is on and you drive it anyway; the brakes don't work and you hit a tree.
Is the car manufacturer or the nursery who planted the tree responsible? No doofus, you are.
Just my opinion.
Posted by: Lou Sussler | Friday, November 19, 2010 at 05:56 AM
@ Lou
STOP talking sense, please.
Posted by: Tom Weidermeijer | Friday, November 19, 2010 at 10:53 AM
Lamb, Buddy, Max: He stated in his complaint that his damages were *at least* $75,000. He had to because that is the jurisdictional minimum in Federal court.
Posted by: megath | Sunday, November 21, 2010 at 08:49 AM