Obscure Store and Reading Room
Home
Monday, August 16, 2010
Court says shopping mall can't regulate what shoppers talk about
The mall ownes didn't want strangers talking to each other if they weren't talking about the mall, according to this story. The court says that's going too far.
(Sacramento Bee)
Aug 16, 2010 6:07:22 AM
NEXT POST
Kiss fan dresses up like Gene Simmons "purely out of boredom"
The 32-year-old man was the winner and only contestant in the Illinois State Fair’s Kiss Costume Competition. (Springfield Journal-Register)
PREVIOUS POST
Man arrested for driving drunk on Craftsman lawn mower
Richard Paschen told a deputy that he has had so many DUI charges that he's lost count. (South Florida Sun Sentinel)
1
Following
36
Followers
Search
Recent Comments
rickets:
im gonna miss you OSRR(JIM). been reading almos...
|
more »
On
Dear readers: After 13 years, I'm closing The Obscure Store
twerp:
Nope! Regina beat you to it! And now I beat R...
|
more »
On
Dear readers: After 13 years, I'm closing The Obscure Store
ReginaFilangee:
And to quote Lee Greenwood, ...thank my lucky...
|
more »
On
Dear readers: After 13 years, I'm closing The Obscure Store
So can people who already know each other talk about sports, the weather, and the Jonas Brothers or Zsa Zsa Gabor without filling out a form?
Posted by: Sheila | Monday, August 16, 2010 at 06:12 AM
you arent talking about the mall.
Citizens arrest, citizens arrest.
Barney Fife, mall cop!
Posted by: Jim | Monday, August 16, 2010 at 06:24 AM
Be careful. Big Mall Brother is watching.
Posted by: He Who Shall Not Be Named | Monday, August 16, 2010 at 06:33 AM
A "citizen's arrest" of a "law" made up by a mall, eh? There are so many things wrong with that it is not even funny. Does that mean McDonald's can slap you in cuffs if you don't order fries, too?
Posted by: batsu | Monday, August 16, 2010 at 06:35 AM
What about all those weirdos who try to get you to fill out questionaires in exchange for coupons? Once I got suckered into that, and they had me go into a room and drink little cups of coffee from one of those coffee pod machines - years before it hit the market. The coffee was "meh" and it took over an hour to fill out the form. When all was said and done, what did I get? Coupons for coffee pods with no expiration date! Yay! It took two more years before they were on the store shelf... what a crock.
If some preacher tried to convert me, I'd just try to convert him right back! That's how I roll, I do what I want, I run with ten gangs and we only commit hate crimes...
Posted by: Waffenmaus | Monday, August 16, 2010 at 06:46 AM
Deceptive write-up. This is just another in the long line of private property regulation of solicitation cases. The case involved some Jesus Freakers who were getting on customers' nerves.
Posted by: Mike | Monday, August 16, 2010 at 06:47 AM
That's outrageous! What will these shoppers think up next- spending their money at other stores?
Posted by: sometimesilie | Monday, August 16, 2010 at 06:49 AM
I don't want to register with the Sac Bee to read the article, but perhaps they are attempting to cut down on solicitors, beggers, and such. I can't believe that they would have a problem with people making small talk in line. There are a lot of crazy freakazoids in Sacramento that you might not want talking to you in the mall.
Posted by: yllek | Monday, August 16, 2010 at 06:54 AM
The guy was definitely trying to drum up business for his church. But the women were in a conversation with him when the mall cops said it was against mall law. I don't know how they thought they could get away with that.
Is it that when people get annoyed they lose the ability to realize that laws/rules have to apply generally rather than specifically or that they can't manage such an understanding at all?
Posted by: Displaced | Monday, August 16, 2010 at 07:05 AM
Actually yllek, they were asked about small talk and basically replied; "All the people need to do is come in 3 days before they want to make small talk and fill out an application to do so."
I won't be shopping anywhere that this company owns. All they needed to do to avoid panhandling and religious proselytizing would be to ban solicitation on their premises without specific permission. That would still allow small talk.
Posted by: David | Monday, August 16, 2010 at 07:07 AM
I read stories like this and it makes me ashamed to admit that I am a California Native. Then I realize what a relief it is not to live there anymore.
Posted by: KDP | Monday, August 16, 2010 at 07:08 AM
What David said above. Ban soliciting and kick out the street preachers. Problem solved.
This was a case of a zealous property manager going to ridiculous extremes without consulting higher legal authority. If you've ever spent any time dealing with property management companies, you know that they're usually full of, ah... sub-intelligent people.
Posted by: A Pile of Pooh | Monday, August 16, 2010 at 07:15 AM
So if I wanted to tell the mall spokesbitch that she's a soulless corporate tool, I'd have to apply in writing three days in advance?
Posted by: Phranqlin | Monday, August 16, 2010 at 07:39 AM
First we can't smoke, now we can't talk. Where is this all going to end?
Posted by: jj | Monday, August 16, 2010 at 07:41 AM
"First we can't smoke, now we can't talk. Where is this all going to end?"
@jj...that's simple. When we are all in a deep dark hole, burned to ashes, or have our head frozen in a cryogenic chamber....
Posted by: Boba Fett | Monday, August 16, 2010 at 08:45 AM
Next they will want to ban the picnic table, and the family dog.
Posted by: Rock Marine | Monday, August 16, 2010 at 08:54 AM
Well, Phranqlin... I think if you said; "Mall spokesbitch;you are a soulless corporate tool and the mall has a great air-conditioning setting." you might be able to get around the 3-day small-talk application rule.
But I don't know for sure.
Posted by: David | Monday, August 16, 2010 at 09:00 AM
Jeez, you people talk like the thought police is a bad thing. Frankly, I'm comforted by people in positions of self-perceived authority telling me what to think, say, and do.
Why, thank you, I DO love to shop at Forever 21. And yes, I'd be happy to publicly cheer the fantastic-and-not-at-all-draconian practices in your well-managed business/institution. I love you. I really, really love you. Now, kiss me, you fool. I must run to the polls to vote.
Posted by: mybrainhurts | Monday, August 16, 2010 at 09:19 AM
This gives me the skeevies like HOAs do.
Posted by: Sigh | Monday, August 16, 2010 at 11:27 AM
they treat their mall like jim treats this website
Posted by: buddy | Monday, August 16, 2010 at 11:38 AM
No verbal communication. Sign language, then? Do you know what this finger means?
Posted by: RockyMtnMac | Monday, August 16, 2010 at 12:29 PM
I can't believe none of you clowns didn't say anything about the christ pusher's name.
He ought to be a priest.lol
Posted by: American Veteran | Monday, August 16, 2010 at 01:08 PM
"The panel reversed Placer Superior Court Judge Larry D. Gaddis' ruling in favor of Westfield LLC and sent the case back to him for further proceedings."
The panel's single response Gaddis' ruling?
"WTF were you thinking?"
Really, what kindergarten teacher thought she/he could get away with violation of free speech in this country? And they still defend it? Sounds like some of the people I now work for.
Posted by: LimeGreenLizard | Monday, August 16, 2010 at 02:26 PM
I don't register for on-line news...sorry Jim...but if Mike is correct about the Story, then I think they are correct to stop the Jesus freaks from harassing people too nice and unassertive to tell them to get the Flock away!
It IS just the same as Solicitation and it IS Private property.
It is NOT "Thought Police", but a Right to keep your mall open and inviting to people who will spend money.
Posted by: Krash | Tuesday, August 17, 2010 at 04:30 AM
@ LGL
You ARE exercising Free Speech...hell, start a Blog and type what you want...it's your "Field of Dreams". Just don't bother strangers at my shopping mall. We KNOW from body language when someone is in a conversation they'd rather NOT be in...and we have a right to minimize stress on our clients as we see fit.
Posted by: Krash | Tuesday, August 17, 2010 at 04:37 AM
But, but, it is not fascism if WE do it!
Posted by: johnjohn | Tuesday, August 17, 2010 at 01:36 PM
In addition to:
-Lacking a grasp of what might not be a legal or enforceable policy
-Not being mentally flexible enough to implement an other than a blanket policy banning all casual conversation if their aim was only to prevent preachers etc
The owners of the mall seem to not be aware of a big reason many people go to malls - the possibility of making new acquaintances. This is one of the reasons malls were invented - to lure people to the stores renting space in the mall with the promise of being around people and maybe leaving with something that most people value more than anything they can buy in the mall - a new acquaintance, friend or, well, you know...
Posted by: C Dauod Huk | Friday, August 20, 2010 at 12:50 PM
How about just making the rule "No harassing the customers" or "Don't try to sell your religion in our store"
Posted by: kasumi | Friday, August 20, 2010 at 01:17 PM