Rev. Edward P. Lyman was using his computer to project an informational DVD about the diocesan Annual Appeal when he accidentally showed "inappropriate personal photographs" of scantily clad males that were stored on his computer. "This event was greatly disturbing to those who were present," says another priest. [Note: Times-Tribune is a bit slow to load.] (Scranton Times-Tribune | Short AP story)

Scantily clad males? A priest? Shocking! (Well, not really. Par for the course!) Another Scranton-area pedophile (oops, priest) was charged with child porn----the story is linked to the "minimally attired" story.
Posted by: GWC | Tuesday, November 03, 2009 at 05:58 AM
Bu what about the children?
Posted by: LimeGreenLizard | Tuesday, November 03, 2009 at 06:09 AM
@ GWC:
Homosexual does NOT equal pedophile but apparently GWC DOES equal ill-bred evolutionary throwback. Enjoy your day =)
Posted by: sometimesilie | Tuesday, November 03, 2009 at 06:34 AM
There are no accidents...
Posted by: d'ep | Tuesday, November 03, 2009 at 06:40 AM
I feel sorry for the priest. Who of us would want our private sexual fixations to be exposed in public in the most humiliating manner possible? Not me!
Yeah, there were a bunch of vows broken on many levels by our priestly closet case. And if he's been toeing the current church line and yammering from the pulpit about hating teh gays, he's a hypocrite. But at least he's not a pedophile.
Posted by: Phranqlin | Tuesday, November 03, 2009 at 07:27 AM
Here is a thought.... let the priests marry! (Or recruit Anglican Priests, lmao).
The idea put forth by St. Jerome (around the year 200 CE) that sexual matters were best dealt with by celibate experts has been proven wrong.
Posted by: johnjohn | Tuesday, November 03, 2009 at 07:59 AM
Perhaps the celibacy business was instituted because the church didn't want to have to support the children/families of priests
Posted by: Lambiepie | Tuesday, November 03, 2009 at 08:25 AM
Here's yet another butt fucker hypocrite~~
http://ydr.inyork.com/ci_13679014
Posted by: American Veteran | Tuesday, November 03, 2009 at 08:56 AM
JohnJohn- Yeah, its like asking the blind to help you pick out curtains.
Posted by: Rev JSH | Tuesday, November 03, 2009 at 09:52 AM
Oh wow.... awkward...
Posted by: Kasumi | Tuesday, November 03, 2009 at 10:11 AM
AmVet, thanks for that link. Made me laugh and cry.
Posted by: johnjohn | Tuesday, November 03, 2009 at 01:23 PM
Think about it: why would someone become a priest in the first place? This is an occupation in which you are required to give up your sexuality. Only someone who has some kind of problem with their sexuality would do something like that. I think that's why there are so many pedophiles among the priesthood. This priest is obviously gay. Yet he probably loathes himself for it. So he becomes a priest to try to control himself. The problem is, the sex drive is just too powerful. He should quit being a priest and just be gay. As for the pedophiles, they should be pumped full of chemicals that suppress their urges. Turn them into zombies.
Posted by: wank | Tuesday, November 03, 2009 at 01:25 PM
I wonder if he uttered "Oh Shit!" into the microphone.
Posted by: LimeGreenLizard | Tuesday, November 03, 2009 at 01:30 PM
@johnjohn - Actually, they are.
Posted by: Navy Chief | Tuesday, November 03, 2009 at 02:21 PM
AV thanks for the link- I did get chills at the former DA of York labeling child porn as "passively criminal" and deciding the priest was a "wonderful guy" leaving them not wanting to prosecute.
Posted by: ill_literate | Tuesday, November 03, 2009 at 02:47 PM
What exactly do priest do? Why don't any of them like women?
Posted by: gator host | Thursday, November 05, 2009 at 01:42 PM