Obscure Store and Reading Room
Home
Tuesday, February 12, 2008
Seattle Times rejects "Vagina Monologues" ad because of artwork
The heart in the ad is too vagina-like for the daily newspaper.
(Seattle Weekly)
Feb 12, 2008 9:32:48 AM
NEXT POST
Driver, 81: "My foot got stuck and it wouldn't come off"
Because of that, Vincent Lowenberg drove his Nissan Altima into a bank. "I'm trading this in for a Cadillac," he said after the accident. (Lake Oswego Review)
PREVIOUS POST
Falling moose nearly takes out Alaska State Trooper
The animal landed on the side of the road just a few yards in front of the trooper. He snapped a couple of photos and called one of the charities that salvage road kill to tell them there was a...
1
Following
36
Followers
Search
Recent Comments
rickets:
im gonna miss you OSRR(JIM). been reading almos...
|
more »
On
Dear readers: After 13 years, I'm closing The Obscure Store
twerp:
Nope! Regina beat you to it! And now I beat R...
|
more »
On
Dear readers: After 13 years, I'm closing The Obscure Store
ReginaFilangee:
And to quote Lee Greenwood, ...thank my lucky...
|
more »
On
Dear readers: After 13 years, I'm closing The Obscure Store
Seriously...a vagina..is just a part of the human anatomy...why are we, as a society, so freaked out by the human form?
Posted by: Cherie | Tuesday, February 12, 2008 at 09:43 AM
" It's okay for a house of worship — I know it's hanging in many other synagogues and Jewish institutions."
Yes, but your Christian brothers and sisters though they believe they were made in the image of God, very much wish God hadn't included his/her "naughty bits". Because somehow when you're Christian, a natural allegedly God-given portion of your anatomy is somehow evil. I'm not sure which bible passage supports this bizarre belief, but there must be one. Right?
Posted by: I Have A Vagina! | Tuesday, February 12, 2008 at 09:51 AM
This again? Will the prudes ever get a life?
Posted by: fb | Tuesday, February 12, 2008 at 09:53 AM
VAGINA!
Posted by: sometimesilie | Tuesday, February 12, 2008 at 10:05 AM
A vagina is a hairy end of the gut, that's all.
Posted by: Ted | Tuesday, February 12, 2008 at 10:18 AM
-----
Seriously...a vagina..is just a part of the human anatomy...why are we, as a society, so freaked out by the human form?
-----
No its worse. It's a drawing that almost, but not quite, is kind of, an artistic rendering, that could be interpreted to represent the human form.
Posted by: stopeatingmysesamecake | Tuesday, February 12, 2008 at 10:25 AM
Somebody was asleep in anatomy class.
Posted by: Electric Mayhem | Tuesday, February 12, 2008 at 10:28 AM
"...your Christian brothers and sisters..."
Let's not get into Christian-bashing or religion-bashing here.... I dare say there are plenty of Christian denominations or congregations that wouldn't have any more problem with it than this particular Jewish one, and also plenty of Jewish ones (for example, the more Orthodox varieties) that would have the same objections as the newspaper. As for other religions, I don't know, but I'd guess (for example) Islam would not look favorably on this kind of thing.
Yes, the vagina is part of the human form, but so is your asshole (which is actually "the hairy end of the gut," Ted, not the vagina). Would you take a crap in public, just because it's a natural bodily function, and claim that no one should object?
Laws against indecent exposure and so on may have their origins in religious strictures, but if that were the only reason for them, you'd think they'd have fallen away with the removal of religion from most aspects of public life. Laws against adultery and homosexuality, at least between consenting adults, pretty much *have* disappeared in this country, so you know that kind of change does occur. But we *do* still have laws against indecent exposure, which to me indicates that there's a component to them that goes beyond religion. Maybe it's about privacy or something, or it could be a holdover religious objection that just hasn't fully worn off yet.
I'm not saying this kind of image is the same as someone displaying an actual vagina in public, but where the line should be drawn is certainly not clear. What about an artistically done photograph? I respect the newspaper's decision to avoid offending their readership if that's what they think it would do.
Posted by: KC | Tuesday, February 12, 2008 at 10:46 AM
It's not as if it's an Abercrombie & Fitch catalog.
Posted by: Phranqlin | Tuesday, February 12, 2008 at 11:10 AM
Apparently I'm the only one who wouldn't be comfortable with my 11-year-old son (if I had an 11-year-old son) seeing that artwork.
Posted by: UmberGryphon | Tuesday, February 12, 2008 at 11:40 AM
I have a vagina...just sharing.
(No disrespect intended for any one trying to be serious.)
Posted by: Lylly | Tuesday, February 12, 2008 at 11:49 AM
Lylly,
Can we see it to compare it to the heart shaped one?
Posted by: slug | Tuesday, February 12, 2008 at 12:02 PM
Shhhh...don't anybody tell them about Joe Camel.
Posted by: Me | Tuesday, February 12, 2008 at 12:17 PM
----
Apparently I'm the only one who wouldn't be comfortable with my 11-year-old son (if I had an 11-year-old son) seeing that artwork.
----
I think an 11 year old would have to have seen one before to be able to make it out in that artwork.
Posted by: arthurtwoshedsjackson | Tuesday, February 12, 2008 at 12:27 PM
Lylly, I am a fan, even though I don't have one myself. Keep up the good work.
:)
Posted by: sometimesilie | Tuesday, February 12, 2008 at 12:34 PM
Good grief. I wouldn't have a problem with a child of any age seeing that. Too young and they won't get that aspect, so what's the harm? A bit older? It might be funny. Older than that? Hopefully just adult and understanding about a piece of art.
Quick, someone spray paint over all those Georgia O'Keefe prints before some poor child gets drawn astray!!!
Posted by: LooseyGoosey | Tuesday, February 12, 2008 at 12:35 PM
sometimesilie, that spam filter is a drag, huh?
Posted by: Me | Tuesday, February 12, 2008 at 12:36 PM
I inadvertently hit the 'thumbs-up' button on my firefox bar. As I said, I got excited.
and LG, I think I'm going to try and find some of this Georgia O'Keefe you're talking about. What issue/month was she in?
Posted by: sometimesilie | Tuesday, February 12, 2008 at 12:39 PM
At a certain age, the image could be bone-crushingly embaressing. especially if you are with your trying-very-hard-to-be-hip parent.
Evokes, for me, RA Wilson and R Shea's discussion of the sacred heart image in "The Illuminatus". It was a little on the psychedelic side carrying on about red, wet, throbbing organ... made mass a little disturbing for a while.
[This post meets the USDA standard for MRROA ~ Minimum Required Reference to Original Article~as described in Publication 49-06D, Potrzebie]
Posted by: nellagain | Tuesday, February 12, 2008 at 01:28 PM
uhhhh Ted.....if you think that the vagina is the end of the gut...you might want to go back to high school and re-take Health and/or Anatomy...the colon is at the end of the gut...the vagina has nothing to do with the gut...., digestion, defication, etc.
Posted by: Cherie | Tuesday, February 12, 2008 at 01:29 PM
Nell: please stick to the topic: spiders crawling on my arm. What is to be done about them. Before I seriously freak out. Again.
Thank you.
Posted by: sometimesilie | Tuesday, February 12, 2008 at 01:44 PM
...make that spiders crawling on all our arms...
Posted by: sometimesilie | Tuesday, February 12, 2008 at 01:45 PM
I just wish the Seattle Times would stop beating around the... wait a minute.
Posted by: Dave in Chicago | Tuesday, February 12, 2008 at 02:05 PM
Okie Dokie boys. IF you have not read the Vagina Monologues then do it. Talk about new info. whew. I have a much greater apprciation for the plight of the vagina. I feel that men should read this book more than women. But I am a lesbian trapped in a mans body.
There's nothin' than coming up looking like a glazed doughnut. Num,num
Sorry...(no i'm not)
Posted by: Yucca | Tuesday, February 12, 2008 at 02:30 PM
Yes, this art has been commended as being strongly vaginal which bothers some men. The word itself makes some men uncomfortable. Vagina. They don't like hearing it and find it difficult to say, whereas without batting an eye, a man will refer to his dick, or his rod, or his Johnson.
Posted by: KF | Tuesday, February 12, 2008 at 03:06 PM
I don't think I maid myself clear. I simply love vaginas. The word vagina itself makes a little weak in the knees.
Posted by: Yucca | Tuesday, February 12, 2008 at 03:15 PM
anyone remember the Everyone Loves Raymond episode where Marie takes up sculpting?
Posted by: BFT | Tuesday, February 12, 2008 at 03:22 PM
without the title/play attached to the graphic, it's just a heart design and not terribly creative
Posted by: Lambiepie | Tuesday, February 12, 2008 at 03:23 PM
Everyone may love vaginas, however, they are not the most pleasant body part to view. I would much prefer to look at a this piece of artwork, or as LG previously stated, a Georgia O'Keefe (or in a pinch the flower in The Wall)
Posted by: lawdog | Tuesday, February 12, 2008 at 03:36 PM
I wrote "maid" instead of made. I crack me up.
Posted by: Yucca | Tuesday, February 12, 2008 at 03:42 PM
the plight of the vagina
Really...this sounds like a Disney movie, like "Flight of the Navigator."
"Plight of the Vagina," coming to Disney DVD and Blu Ray soon...
Posted by: Wolf | Tuesday, February 12, 2008 at 04:39 PM
Looks like heart to me, just right for Valentine's day. Odd, I never connected hearts and vaginas before.
Let it run!
Posted by: Charles Brobst | Tuesday, February 12, 2008 at 05:06 PM
BFT..yes, that was one of the funniest episodes.
Posted by: Cherie | Tuesday, February 12, 2008 at 05:51 PM
OH C-MON..ITS JUST A WORD...AND A BEAUTIFUL ONE AT THAT...NOTIND DEGORATORY ABOUT IT...NOTING PERIOD..ITS NORMAL..
BUT THERE ARE STILL THESE MORONIC TYPES WHOM THINK THE WORD..VAGINIA IS DIRTY....ITS A NICE WORD..
Posted by: LOUIS SEBECKE | Tuesday, February 12, 2008 at 07:50 PM
I tried to find Slug and Sometimesilie by their web address to show them but I couldn't find the right states.
Posted by: Lylly | Wednesday, February 13, 2008 at 02:50 AM
Yucca also cracks me up.
Posted by: Lylly | Wednesday, February 13, 2008 at 02:54 AM
So, the word "vagina" prominently on display in the ad doesn't bother the editors of the Times, but the vague, subject-to-interpretation heart graphic makes them blanche. Fascinating.
Also, I must respectfully disagree with lawdog on this one. I find the vagina a very pleasant part of the anatomy to view.
Posted by: WellThen | Wednesday, February 13, 2008 at 10:10 AM
Lylly, I'm here! I live in a good state! It's Pennsylvania, not Mississippi. We can even sell sex toys here. Don't forget about me!
Posted by: sometimesilie | Wednesday, February 13, 2008 at 02:11 PM
Lylly
I'm in Idaho...
Posted by: yucca | Thursday, February 14, 2008 at 01:27 PM
Lawdog vs. WellThen on whether it's a "pleasant body part to view...." It depends on your perspective (or gender and/or sexual orientation). I am reminded of a song from Gilbert & Sullivan's "The Gondoliers," sung by the lovely Gianetta about the prospect of being separated from her beloved Marco for a time, part of which says:
Some kind of charm you seem to find
In womankind,
Some source of unexplained delight,
Unless you're jesting.
But what attracts you, I confess
I cannot guess;
To me a woman's face is quite
Uninteresting.
But I suppose even someone interested in experiencing a vagina in other ways might still not be particularly keen on *looking* at one.
Posted by: KC | Monday, February 18, 2008 at 10:05 AM
Revitol products review, solutions and treatments on Revitol anti aging, Revitol acne treatments, Revitol cellulite problems, Revitol skin exfoliator, Revitol skin cleansing, Revitol anti wrinkles, Revitol stretch marks by www.revitolskincarez.com
Posted by: Revitol | Saturday, November 15, 2008 at 11:12 AM
Revitol products review, solutions and treatments on Revitol anti aging, Revitol acne treatments, Revitol cellulite problems, Revitol skin exfoliator, Revitol skin cleansing, Revitol anti wrinkles, Revitol stretch marks by www.revitolskincarez.com
Posted by: Revitol | Saturday, November 15, 2008 at 11:15 AM